The proof

Measured on real systems, honest about the boundary

The proof

Safe by construction across cyber, power grid, robotics and driving. A real building, run live. The whole model on a real quantum computer.

Cyber defense · NASim

Safe by construction

Request a technical discussion

Outcome

Zero unsafe commitments, goal reached 100% (10/10).

Stack

Guarded controller, runtime safety contract

Workflow

  • No positive evidence of safety, no commitment
  • Unsafe action never forms, not penalised after
  • Task still solved, not paralysed
Power grid · grid2op

Survives the disturbance

Request a technical discussion

Outcome

0.000 unsafe, 100% grid survival, top score 291.9.

Stack

Guarded controller vs uncontrolled baseline

Workflow

  • Guarded run keeps the grid alive
  • Uncontrolled run blacks out
  • Guarded controller wins the benchmark outright
Building autonomy · Helsinki

Designs it, then operates it

Request a technical discussion

Outcome

0 vs 11 safety violations under the same disturbance.

Stack

Real Helsinki geometry + ERA5 climate, reduced-order physics

Workflow

  • Designs the building from real physics data
  • Operates it in a control loop with commit / hold
  • Holds comfort while trimming energy
Real quantum · 36 qubits

Whole model on a QPU

Request a technical discussion

Outcome

Perceive, decide, speak, compose, end-to-end on hardware.

Stack

Real 36-qubit quantum computer

Workflow

  • Runs end-to-end on real qubits
  • Trained on-device above the 24-qubit wall
  • No advantage claimed, architecture is the edge
The problem

Three kinds of AI. One blind spot they share.

Plain LLM

  • Fluent and confident, no grounding in physical truth
  • Fails silently outside its training data
  • Same certainty whether right or catastrophically wrong
  • Never unsure, can't tell until it's too late
  • Safety bolted on as a filter after the fact

With Qorina

  • One physics-grounded belief about the real world
  • Reaches the new where pattern-matchers collapse
  • Carries a calibrated sense of how sure it is
  • Commits, holds, or escalates, never bluffs
  • Unsafe action never forms, safe by construction
Proof

Measured, not promised

0

Unsafe commitments, by construction, across four safety domains

0%

Decision accuracy on the cases it commits to

0q

The whole model runs end-to-end on a real quantum computer

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

A physics-grounded foundation model for the physical world. One belief about a system, read into five faculties, perceive, design, decide, speak and create, carrying a calibrated sense of how sure it is. Not a chatbot with a safety filter.

The intelligence between action and consequence

Building autonomy that has to be safe, or discovery that has to be real? Let's talk about where Qorina fits.